Saturday, August 19, 2017

Violence Has Been Officially Legitimized: The Charlottesville Doctrine

The Republicans and Democrats alike have condemned the very idea that Antifa has any culpability. The groundrules have changed: civility is eliminated.
The Charlottesville Doctrine
Further demonstration of the fact that the terms Republican and Democrat have no meaning is the way the cowards and traitors of the Republican establishment have come out in favor of Antifa, the new KKK of both parties. There is no other way to interpret the vehemence with which the Bushes, Rubio, McCain, Cory Gardener, etc, etc have attacked Trump for pointing out the simple fact that violence was unleashed on the white supremacists and Nazis at the Charlottesville protest.

Like 'em or not, the white supremacists and Nazi's had a permit to rally and it was the responsibility of the state to protect that right and to protect the demonstrators. Those who did not have a permit were the Antifa counter-demonstrators, who arrived with weapons and the intent to inflict injury on the protesters. This is a coordinated attack on other Americans aided and abetted by the state and city governments.

What Antifa, with the help of government officials, including the police department and state police, have demonstrated to the entire nation, is that if someone has a point of view with which one disagrees, perhaps even vehemently, it should be countered with violence. I don't know what other message to take from the events of Charlottesville. It is a free for all.

In the days of the republic, folks like me allowed for these diverse opinions and points of view and allowed for peaceful demonstrations on behalf of opinions I found detestable, but no longer. Now that the principles of the republic have been done away with and civil discourse obliterated with violence, the sense of dedication to those principles is quickly diminishing.

Before, it was always a trade off, in order to have a civil society the worst points of view had to be tolerated. Now, when I see someone burn an American flag I no longer have to reflect on the whole purpose of the First Amendment and freedom of speech, I can (and should) as dictated by the Charlottesville Doctrine, stomp their head in.

This is the Charlottesville Doctrine: Protests held and engaged in by individuals with disgusting and socially objectionable points of view should be met with violence.

The Charlottesville Doctrine, just so you feel morally secure in these attacks is supported by U.S. Senators on both sides of the aisle. House of Representatives from both sides of the aisle, the media, judges, police officers, governors, mayors and state police. Have at it!

How The Chinese Communists Destroyed Chinese Culture

The baby communists in Antifa are nothing new.
New news is old news happening to new people.
Attributed to Malcom Muggeridge
The Chinese culture was being scoured even before the Cultural Revolution, destroying books, art, Chinese architecture, temples and anything representing the "old culture". People were eradicated for being part of the Old. Chiang Kai-Shek saved much of the museum pieces and heritage items from the Forbidden City Palace and escaped to Taiwan, where the Chinese heritage is still preserved despite Mao's attack.

This is not just a Chinese phenomenon, as the destruction by the Taliban and ISIS demonstrates. For tyrants, only the new culture icons are allowed to exist, so every aspect of historical culture must be eradicated by whatever force is necessary. Pol Pot took it further, demanding that all people become an agrarian stage society, killed the excess and those who were part of the Old.

That's the essence of what is going on with the American Left. It has established public shaming, de-platforming, and doxxing for personal attacks, the remedy for which is loud, sincere-looking virtue signalling while belly-crawling before the inquisitors.

The Left has established its moral code (we are the moral elite, defined by us as intrinsically moral: you are evil and must be eradicated). The Progressive has entered the stage for the violence and destruction of all previous icons of the "old" culture.

They haven't discovered evil white-man books in the library, yet (it's doubtful that they read). But they are now purging the communication lines which revolve around the internet.

Calls for the elimination of "whiteness" are becoming mainstream, and are in academia as well as Leftist, Feminist, Racist Arenas.

So why would whites not rebel? They have been targeted. Their enemies are emboldened and well funded as well as armed and unidentifiable. The destruction of whiteness has begun, and it is a moral imperative for the Left - even whites on the Left.

Think about what should be done.

Then write it here, if you have an idea.

Eugenics in the News

Iceland Eliminates People with Down Syndrome
By killing preborn humans with Down's Syndrome. Other headlines are false, claiming that Iceland has eliminated Down's Syndrome, when in fact they just kill those who have it, before they can be born. This will have to be an ongoing program, because the genetic defect has not been addressed at all. Only killing the victims has been addressed.

BTW, this is why homosexuals don't actually want to find a genetic defect for homosexuality. Homosexuals would be eliminated in the same fashion.

Woody Guthrie: Racist, Son of Klansman, Serial Liar, Bigot

Irony Alert: Charlottesville Candlelight Vigil Features Song From Racist Son of a Klansman
Woodie Guthrie was a phony.

Funding the Rioting Left

The Business Behind the Left’s Pay-to-Protest Scheme
Big-money groups are helping to organize and fuel 'AstroTurf' progressive uprisings


When left-wing organizers were recruiting people to travel to Washington, D.C., to try to “shut down the inauguration of Donald Trump” and “paralyze the city itself,” they offered a number of incentives — free housing, food, and also legal assistance in case of arrest. They also organized training camps, workshops and media-encounter events in the run-up to the main event: the big riot.

[...]

The housing, the food, the organized activities and the defense attorneys at the ready made the riots possible. But why did news reports never mention that the riots were being funded?

It's because the liberal media "sees protests as a tactic," says Tim Graham of the Media Research Center, adding that while the media often label Tea Party gatherings as "AstroTurf events" — and therefore not true grassroots events — it never does the same with the Left.

"They're not going to allow the idea that there's liberal AstroTurf. To suggest such a thing is a conspiracy theory," Graham told LifeZette.

[...]

A year ago, Breitbart reported that hacked Open Society Foundation documents showed that the George Soros-funded group gave Black Lives Matter groups $650,000. The Ford Foundation subsequently announced that it was launching a fundraising campaign to raise $100 million to support Black Lives Matter.

It's unclear how often individual protesters are paid a fee to protest, but regardless, the organizational side of the unrest is becoming big business. The movement first attracted attention with violence in the streets during the Ferguson riots. A raised fist brings notoriety, and notoriety brings in big money. It's a clear exchange.
One hundred million dollars to BLM!? It's profitable to promote violent racism, because you can extort big cash from corporations who want to be left alone...

A Lone Sane Voice: Victor Davis Hanson on the Smug Generation

Historian: The Hypocritical Statue Obsession of a ‘Smug Generation’
Victor Davis Hanson slams progressives who 'pick and choose their type of outrage for political purposes'


Military historian and political columnist Victor Davis Hanson said the “moral smugness” of this current generation allows it to “pick and choose their type of outrage for political purposes,” all the while adhering to a “double standard,” during an interview Wednesday on “The Laura Ingraham Show.”

In the aftermath of Saturday’s violent Charlottesville rally, Hanson, a Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and professor of classics emeritus at California State University, Fresno, pointed to the progressive liberal protesters increasingly clamoring for the removal of statues and monuments honoring Confederate soldiers and leaders. In Durham, North Carolina, a group of protesters toppled a Confederate statue Monday night, while other cities are calling for the removal of such statues.

"This generation has decided that it's the most moral and ethical in history and has the right to go back and pick winners and losers," Hanson said. "I think it's a progressive project in which they pick and choose their type of outrage for political purposes in the present."

The problem, however, is that these protesters and activists don't feel the need to apply the same filters and standards to themselves, he argued. When far-left Antifa activists or Black Lives Matter protesters repeatedly took to the streets calling for retaliation against police officers following high-profile shooting deaths of African-Americans, Hanson noted that such standards weren't applied to these groups.

"They all have this moral smugness, but it's not evenly applied and it doesn't apply to themselves," Hanson said. "This smug generation feels that human nature works like an app on their phone that has to be perfect. But I don't think that people who march in the street and say, 'Pigs in a blanket, fry 'em,' are the moral adjudicators of anything. And yet they think they are."

Hanson noted that many several prominent Confederate leaders did not personally support or condone slavery at the time of the Civil War, and yet because they fought for the South, this current generation views all Confederates as "100 percent bad."

"In other words, we give no room or no allowances that people are human and that they make mistakes in history's tragedy," he said. "It's not melodrama where we go back and judge people as a hundred percent good or a hundred percent bad. And yet that's what we're doing."

Hanson noted that the Left doesn't slime the memory of other icons and heroes because of imperfections in their life.

"Are we going to say that we can't honor Martin Luther King because he was known to be a little bit rough with women? Is that a sin that cancels out all the good that he did?" he asked.

"[The Left doesn't] have political power … but they, in recompense, they really exaggerate cultural influence," Hanson said, noting that the Left holds universities, the media, and Hollywood captive and "use that to counteract their political impotence."

"And they're very successful at it because they either force conservatives to apologize or to virtue-signal among one another who's the more moral or ethical or ready to concede a point," he added.

LifeZette Editor-in-Chief Laura Ingraham brought up her sparring match Tuesday night with syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer on Fox News' "Special Report," in which the two clashed over President Donald Trump's Tuesday press conference.

The president had doubled down on his Saturday comments in which he blamed "many sides" for the violence in Charlottesville. On Monday, Trump specifically condemned "white supremacists" and "neo-Nazis." On Tuesday, he blamed both the Alt-Left and the Alt-Right for contributing to the violence.

Krauthammer dubbed Trump's Tuesday press conference "a moral disgrace," saying that Trump "reverted back to Saturday" and undermined his strong Monday statement because it wasn't really "in his heart."

Hanson said Krauthammer was applying a certain double standard to Trump.

"I agree that [Trump] should have said it earlier. But the fact is, he did say it, and I don't think it was because it wasn't in his heart," he responded. "I do think he's not a racist by any means. And I don't understand Charles Krauthammer, because after the policemen were killed by a racist sniper, people asked Barack Obama to condemn the type of movement that had led to that, the Black Lives Matter. And he said the problem was guns."

"And in Fort Hood, that person yelled 'Allahu Akbar' as he killed and mowed down and butchered 13 people. And Obama said, 'Let's not rush to judgment,'" Hanson added. "If Trump had said, rather than blaming both sides for the cycle of violence, 'Let's not rush to judgment,' people would have been outraged."

Hanson advised both the Never-Trumpers on the Right and the Never-Trumpers on the Left to "step back and see that people, for a variety of reasons, have a deep antipathy for Donald Trump, and that clouds their empirical judgment."
Ingraham and Krauthammer Clash Over Trump’s Rocky Press Conference

"A lot of people just can't get over that fact. And then they find out that the more that they automatically slander and smear Trump, the more that they feel they accrue virtue and acknowledgment, influence," Hanson said. "I think they're creating a landscape in which we all want to jump and damn Trump because they feel that, either career-wise or moral-wise or I don't know what-wise, but it makes us feel good. But we don't look at it empirically."

Hanson also jabbed Krauthammer, saying that the panelist "could have reminded people" that "Barack Obama invited a rapper to the White House [Kendrick Lamar], whose album that week came out with a dead white judge with his eyes x'd out with African-American rappers toasting his demise on the White House lawn."

"And no one said, 'Should the president of the United States be condoning or promoting a rapper who celebrates the murder of a judge?' And that was a racist thing, that album was abjectly racist," he said.

"But a lot of kids, our new generation, they look at that and they think, 'Wow, there's a double standard.' And nobody wants to say that because if you say that, then all of a sudden everything in your career, everything in your life, everything in your atmospherics — you pay a price for that," Hanson concluded. "And that is how brilliantly the Left has done."

Friday, August 18, 2017

The Proper Term is "Sheee-it!"

California Bill: 1 Year in Jail for Using Wrong Transgender Pronoun

A new bill being considered by the California State Senate would punish people who “willfully and repeatedly” refuse “to use a transgender resident’s preferred name or pronouns” in a public health, retirement or housing institution.

The bill, SB 219, was proposed by State Sen. Scott Wiener (D-San Francisco). It includes several other provisions that require a health facility, for example, to honor the gender identity of a patient, meaning that the patient must be admitted to a room that comports with his or her chosen gender; allowed to use whatever bathroom he or she wants to use; and wear whatever clothing or cosmetics he or she decides to wear. It has gone through several amendments.

CBN News notes: “Fines for repeat offenders could be as high as $1,000 and a jail term of up to a year.

Woman Who Destroyed Statue is Pro-Slavery - In North Korea

Of Course She Is:
Woman Who Destroyed Durham Confederate Statue Is A Pro-North Korea Marxist

One of the activists who toppled a Confederate statue in Durham, N.C., on Monday night is a member of an extreme leftist group that supports the totalitarian regime in North Korea and wants to abolish capitalism.

Taqiyah Thompson, a student at North Carolina Central University, was arrested Tuesday following a press conference in which she defended the actions of the demonstrators and equated police officers to Confederate soldiers and Ku Klux Klan members.

“I did the right thing,” she said. “Everyone who was there — the people did the right thing. The people will continue to keep making the right choices until every Confederate statue is gone, until white supremacy is gone. That statue is where it belongs. It needs to be in the garbage.”

Thompson is a member of the Worker’s World Party (WWP), a revolutionary Marxist-Leninist group originally formed in 1959 as a hard-line offshoot of the more moderate Socialist Workers Party. In addition to supporting a wide range of far-left causes, the group also defends the North Korean regime of dictator Kim Jong-un against alleged U.S. imperialism.
Marxists are all very disturbed.

Jason Kessler Discusses Antifa



The color coded tactics explain the hit and run-away actions of Antifa attackers. And Kessler seems less disrespectable than I envisioned him... but this is just an isolated video, not deterministic evidence. I had suspicions that he was a false flag from the Left. Now I'm not so sure.

NYT Lets It Slip, But Covers It Up Quickly

NY Times Reporter Admits Antifa Protesters In Charlottesville Were 'Hate-Filled' And Violent Before Left Forces Her To Backtrack
"I saw club-wielding 'antifa' beating white nationalists being led out of the park."

New York Times reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg made the mistake of admitting that along with the abhorrent, violent, white supremacists who terrorized Charlottesville over the weekend, many Antifa protesters were also enacting "hate-filled" violence, as they've done in several other cities in recent months. For noting that the "hard left seemed as hate-filled as the alt-right" — citing "club-wielding 'antifa' beating white nationalists being led out of the park" — Stolberg was hammered online, even after repenting and issuing a correction that depicted the violent left in more heroic terms.
.

Accellerating Attacks on Dissidents

WHO are we talking about? Cuba? China? Russia? Antifa?

Nope, just in the Leftist poster child for successful socialism. (Sweden? EU? Congo, maybe?)

Just Venezuela, taking the next step toward equality, eradicating all badthink.

The Way It Is


This is certainly a better division, because it puts most Repubican Cucks into the category where they belong: Globalists.

Consider globalism for a moment. First look at the globe, the nations which would have to be conquered. Look at their cultures and ask what culture would dominate under globalism? How would it be established? Under what Moral Law, Sharia? How will it feel to have your neighborhood patrolled by Sudanese and Liberian soldiers (looking for violations and equalization opportunities)?

Globalization is the objective, from Carter to the Clintons, Bushes, Obama, the entire Executive Branch of unelected dictators, half of Congress and roughly half of the Supreme Court and much or most of the federal court judiciaries.

Why? I can see two obvious reasons. First is increased power which they believe can enforce universal love and obedience in their utopia. Second, is that the tactic of "end justifies the means" supercedes all other moral principles, and the powerful can certainly agree on that principle.

The enemies then are free men, clustered in nations, given to free thought and free speech, and dedicated to the preservation of their intellectual and moral heritage.

So we are indeed separated into nationalist (preservationist) vs globalist (Conquistadors and moral dictators).

Thursday, August 17, 2017

ANDDDD... Here it is!

That didn't take long, did it? Yep. Placate the rioters with statues of their own kind of heroes, as if they deserve it:
A Solution to The Monument Controversy: Build New Statues Dedicated to Minorities in American History
That won't stop them from destruction of what they deem offensive. Try that with the Taliban and ISIS, see how it goes over. Good Grief.

Modern Lenin Explains the Red Revolution (Coming Soon)


CNN's Jake Tapper

CNN's Tapper: People Need to Know That Antifa Has Assaulted a Number of Journalists
When it's journalists who are attacked, the attackers are no longer called "demonstrators" or "protestors"; they become "rioters" in that instant. Welcome to reality, Jake: will it stick?

Communist Apologists

Communists infecting the Republican Party:
McCain, Romney, and Rubio Join the Republicans for Antifa Club
Any contradiction of Trump is fair game for these principle-free politicians, even if it means endorsing illegal Communist attacks on legal protestors. All of these have previously lost credibility, but now are seen with their immorality in full flower.

Protesters Fail Inadvertent IQ Test #2

Vigilante protesters start DIGGING UP body of Confederate general and KKK leader Nathan Forrest from his grave
Forrest was a DEMOCRAT. He started the KKK as a DEMOCRAT. That's DEMOCRAT history, just like all the Confederate Icons they want destroyed.

Slavery: Democrat Party formed to protect slavery.
Confederacy: Democrat.
Civil War: Democrat Secession to save slavery.
Jim Crow: Democrat oppression of blacks.
Ghetto Plantations: Democrat oppression of blacks.
Marxist Identity Class war: Democrat.
Political Violence: Leftist/Democrat.
White eliminationism: Leftist/Democrat racism.

WaPo Platforms Leftist Call For Violence

Rubicon: WaPo Op-Ed Openly Calls For Political Violence

For anyone paying attention over the last 100 or so years, it was only a matter of time before America's establishment Left, meaning elected Democrats and the mainstream media, found themselves so frustrated they would finally come right out and validate violence, or what can only be described as political terrorism, against their ideological enemies.

Going back to the Bolsehviks straight through to Barry Obama's terrorist-pal Bill Ayers, violence is always the end result of an ideology that demands purity and conformity, even at the point of a gun. And now, probably because they have been unable to bully President Trump to its will, The Washington Post has finally revealed itself as an un-American and un-democratic monster.

In an editorial published Tuesday, N.D.B. Collins, an associate professor at Johns Hopkins University, was handed the imprimatur of The Washington Post to call for "direct action," direct action in the form of actual political violence.
Charlottesville Showed That Liberalism Can’t Defeat White Supremacy. Only Direct Action Can.

The white nationalist riot in Charlottesville, a city that boasts “diversity makes us stronger,” made a lot of things clear. One of them is that generic solutions to the racial problem — bland affirmations of inclusiveness, tolerance and “free speech” — will no longer work. Indeed, they have never worked, at least not on their own. ...

[I]n April 1968, amid a flurry of other “rocks,” riots shook American cities following the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. It took that rolling unrest, not the promise of further economic growth, to spur President Lyndon Johnson and Congress to action. Within a week they had passed the Fair Housing Act.

Over the past century, liberalism, vexed by an ever-sharp, ever-cutting white supremacy, has needed these rocks. ...

Segregationists have again assumed their pedestals in the Justice Department, the White House and many other American temples. Paper alone won’t drive them out. Start throwing rocks.
Now... Is Professor Collins using the word "rock" as a metaphor?

Why, yes — yes, he is.
Martin Luther King was unavailable for comment.

Protesters Fail Inadvertent IQ Test

Protesters in Atlanta Vandalize ‘Peace Monument’ After Mistaking It for Confederate Symbol

Protesters vandalized and attempted to take down the Peace Monument in Piedmont Park in Atlanta on Sunday, mistaking it for a pro-Confederate statue.

The protesters were marching in response to the violent protests in Charlottesville, Virginia, on Saturday where one woman died after being deliberately hit by a car, and two law enforcement personnel were killed when the helicopter they were in crashed.

“The Atlanta march traveled from Woodruff Park to Piedmont Park Sunday, where some damaged the Peace Monument, erected in 1911,” a blog on the Atlanta Journal-Constitution website said. “The sculpture features an angel standing above a Confederate soldier, guiding him to lay down his weapon.”

Look a Little Closer, Maybe Without That Black Mask On

Dear Leftists, There Are No Nazis Under Your Bed
Actually, that's the wrong place to look; the NAZI is IN your bed: it's YOU, Leftist/Commie-Fascist/Punk.

On CNN: All of GOP are White Supremacists

Why, just being white with an opinion is the same thing as lynching:
THIS Is CNN: Guest Rules the GOP ‘Are’ Neo-Nazis, ‘Old Slave Owners’ Ignoring Lynchings

For anyone who thinks CNN is dedicated to bringing the American people together, you’re sadly mistaken. Case in point two examples from CNN International on early Tuesday and Wednesday mornings where guest Segun Oduolowu declared the GOP to be neo-Nazis while leaders like Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are “old slave owners” who ignored lynchings.

Let’s take the early Tuesday comments first. Oduolowu first lambasted the business CEOs who quit the President’s economic councils for even joining them to begin with because “this feels like fake outrage to me” since “[y]ou knew what this man was.” [Beginning at the 4:43 mark]

Oduolowu pivoted to addressing fellow Los Angeles-based guest and GOP strategist John Thomas, informing him that the neo-Nazis are the Republican Party and he’s “in bed” with them [emphasis mine]:
As a Republican, when you have basically sold your soul to the alt-right, to people who are marching the streets of a college town — an institution for high learning where slaves actually built that university. When they are marching and you own the presidency, you pretty much own the judiciary, you own most of the elected officials and the government, what country were they — are they losing? They are the GOP right now. They are the GOP. You are in bed. You are in bed with the enemy, John. So, please, look. I love you, brother, but defend what you’ve guys done.

Roughly 24 hours later, Oduolowu was back at it following President Trump’s controversial press conference saying that there were good people on “both sides” in Saturday’s antifa and neo-Nazi clashes that left well-being counter-protesters caught up in the violence.

Oduolowu argued that it’s unfair to state that “this rabid base of white nationalists and alt-right that support Trump is a small one, but I think it's larger than people really actually realize because when the leadership of the Republican Party are turning their heads and looking the other way when all of this is going on, it shows almost tacit agreement.”
Here's another chance to play "How Many Lies Can You Find In This?"

The Racists are out in force, attacking whites in general.

It WILL get worse. And worse. And...

Should the MSM be Rewarded for Telling the Truth?

It's no longer an expectation. But here it is:
NBC and the BBC: There were violent left-wing protesters in Charlottesville
But wait, if you care enough, watch the video from NBC and count the other lies. Disgusting.

In better news:
Durham sheriff arrests ladder climber in Confederate statue destruction: ‘No one is getting away with what happened.’
And there is this:
A Brief History of Counterprotesting the Fascists

Owing to a formidable native facility for pessimism, I am infrequently surprised. Though three elements of the last few days did almost tease my brow to furrow.

The first was learning of the suddenly impotent nature of court orders. The Charlottesville right–as you know–came armed with one of these sacred writs–a thing we previously knew to enjoy the power to dictate national policy on every topic. Yet apparently court orders are sufficient only to compel modest functionaries like congress and the president of the United States, while having no power whatsoever over small town leftist mayors. Thus the injunction to allow the Lee Park assembly was summarily ignored, and the court was invited to sit on its thumb if they didn’t like it. I hope someone is noting that for precedent.

The second of these were the frantic and unanimous denunciations of the Charlottesville right by every Republican down to the Humboldt County Clerk. I understand these people are made to attack right like Swiss watches are made to tick, though the sheer Pavlovian reflexiveness and purple pageantry of their language was…well…typical, I suppose.

Though it should be mentioned, this wasn’t just the customary act of conservatives running cover for a left that vividly despises them. There was a cunning calculation in those lugubrious displays. The purpose of which was to scuttle their political competition so that the National Review transvestites could consolidate influence on the right and get conservatives back to losing graciously.

You’ll note that in comparison the left never attacks its radicals. It simply doesn’t acknowledge them at all, and suffers hearing aid failures whenever anyone asks. Thus those things with black masks and baseball bats flourish in the tacit approval of benign indifference. This is how you win generation after generation, by the way. Focusing attacks on your enemies rather than one’s own flanks has been proven since the campaigns of Clausewitz to be a successful tactic. Though certainly not one conservatives will lower themselves to learn.

The final item that has given me about a three volt shock has been the utter and absolute pass given to the left’s explicit communists. Now obviously arriving at such spectacles brandishing a swastika is breathtakingly stupid. Though it should be only slightly more stupid than waving a hammer and sickle. Yet there they are at every fetid left-wing riot without a peep of media reflection or demands of denunciation. I certainly don’t expect a democrat to object to symbols of murderous Bolshevism, though is it beyond the range of even rock-ribbed republicans to mention the fact between gasps about “white supremacy?”

That reminds me of the need to clarify media terms. A supremacist is one who wants a safe and harmonious home absent foreign squatters screaming about his moral infirmities into perpetuity. And CNN deploys other shorthand as well. For instance, teen means a black man of any age, as counterprotestor means a communist of any race. And fascists are whoever counterprotestors attack. It’s really no more complicated than that.

And that’s why I thought it might be useful to recount a non-exhaustive history of counterprotesting, and the Mt. Fuji of fascist corpses it has produced.
Continue at the site for body counts of "fascists" racked up by Lenin's communists and ilk.

"Bolshevik Ethnic Cleansing"?

One of the terms I heard in watching a few of the many, many videos of the Charlottesville confrontation was "Bolshevik ethnic cleansing". In terms of today's Marxist identity warfare, the hated Other is both ideologically and racially, as well as somewhat gender oriented. Within these arenas, Class War has been declared and Leftist violence legitimized.

Professors have started publishing papers regarding the elimination of toxic masculinity. Some universities have courses on eradicating whiteness. There are many white Leftists who now advocate the eradication of whites from political positions, primarily in Democrat politics where the purge is obvious.

The Charlottesville melee resulted in hordes of politicians and business leaders excoriating Trump, who pointed out that the violence was from both sides. While this is partially a continuation of the hysterical war on Trump, it is also a validation of the "moral violence" promoted by the Left.

"Moral violence" is probably the most virulent type in that it is fully justified by an ideology, and required even necessary in order to save the ideology from the hated Other.

The hated Other Class - the designated Oppressors - are now defined as those outside the Messiah/Victimhood Classes: Whites. Whites who stand against this are defined as "White Supremacists", in order to attribute racism and aggression to the class. (Last year whites were the Deplorables).

It is a short step in most countries from the isolation of the Oppressor Class, to the eradication of the Oppressor Class.

Under Obama this attack was covert, disguised as "equalization" of neighborhood demographics and IRS weaponization against the Other, amongst other programs such as not prosecuting the black panthers, arousing racial frenzy in city issues, forcing campus rape accusations to have the weight of conviction, and many other less obvious programs.

Since the Left lost to Trump, the Soros-funded false-fronts have given free rein to the violence, inluding BLM and Antifa and through the organization called By Any Means Necessary. Now the political and business structure has endorsed the violence of the Black Shirts.

Toward what end? Is it not ethnic cleansing to endorse violence against those who are political "enemies"? Violence endorsed by the "moral" elites? Violence directed specifically at silencing any and all opposition?

Of course it is. Even the ACLU acknowledges that.

Leftist political ethnic violence is now fully endorsed; we'll see where it heads, and what resistance it meets.

The American Left has always been violent. From slavery to the Civil War including the killing of Lincoln; to Segregation, the KKK and Jim Crow; to the establishment of Leftist ghetto plantations; and now the Marxist identity war from which no one escapes, and which Antifa brings to the streets.

The Left is irrational, as in insane. And viciously violently insane.

Van Jones Weeps Because...

...Trump blamed BOTH sides for the Charlottesville clash. If you thought maybe the MSM might not be insanely Marxist, then this week should disabuse you of that notion. There is no relationship between what Trump says and what the MSM reports. None. Are they all insane? Or merely evil Marxists?



Even the ACLU is being attacked for its defense of free speech.

Obviously the Antifa Black Shirts are a protected military arm of the Left; one does not blame Antifa Black Shirts for anything no matter how illegal, how violent, how egregious their attacks might be.

The Left is openly justifying violence against their designated Class of Oppressors. Directly contrary to facts, the Left has taken this opportunity to open the door to bloody conflict in the name of their own perverted "morality" - false morality, false facts, justified bloodshed, all in the name of Progressive Love and Utopia.

This is nothing new. It is Maoism/Leninism right here in the USA.

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

One Nation, Under Godless Antifa

Alt-Taliban

NAZIs: The National Socialists Were... SOCIALISTS!

Leftist is as Leftist does, and Hitler was a Leftist (and a Socialist, and a Darwinist).
Vox Day Quotes Hitler:
From the Nazi's mouth
A number of historically ignorant defenders of national socialism have tried to claim that it is not a left-wing socialist ideology. This is utterly and absolutely false, and can be easily and conclusively proven to be false in a number of ways, including by reading a number of direct quotes from Mr. Hitler himself. Note, in particular, that the ultimate goal is "international socialism".
It is not Germany that will turn Bolshevist but Bolshevism that will become a sort of National Socialism. Besides, there is more that binds us to Bolshevism than separates us from it…. I have always made allowance for this circumstance, and given orders that former Communists are to be admitted to the party at once. The petit bourgeois Social-Democrat and the trade union boss will never make a National Socialist, but the Communist always will.

We National Socialists wish precisely to attract all socialists, even the Communists; we wish to win them over from their international camp to the national one.

I have learned a great deal from Marxism as I do not hesitate to admit… The difference between them and myself is that I have really put into practice what these peddlers and pen pushers have timidly begun. The whole of National Socialism is based on it… National Socialism is what Marxism might have been if it could have broken its absurd and artificial ties with a democratic order.

After all, that’s exactly why we call ourselves National Socialists! We want to start by implementing socialism in our nation among our Volk! It is not until the individual nations are socialist that they can address themselves to international socialism.

The Revolution we have made is not a national revolution, but a National-Socialist Revolution. We would even underline this last word, "Socialist."

There is a difference between the theoretical knowledge of socialism and the practical life of socialism. People are not born socialists, but must first be taught how to become them.

I, on the other hand, have tried for two decades to build a new socialist order in Germany, with a minimum of interference and without harming our productive capacity.

As you can see, no adherent to this ideology has any place on the Right, nor can he reasonably describe himself as being Alt-Right. I direct your attention to the very first point of the Alt-Right:
The Alt Right is of the political right in both the American and the European sense of the term. Socialists are not Alt Right. Progressives are not Alt Right. Liberals are not Alt Right. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right.

Being socialists, national socialists of any stripe can never legitimately claim to be Alt Right.
And I would add that RINOs are not Alt Right, and after Charlottesville, virtually no national politician is anything but Leftist, as evidenced by their frenzied virtue signalling and self-righteous bleating, in effect defending Antifa.

Only 30-50 Klansmen in Charlottesville?

I've been attempting with almost no luck to get the demographic breakdown of the various segments of protestors at Charlottesville. I found this local public media report which sheds a very different light on the event.

Protesters Surround KKK Gathering In Charlottesville

Despite urging from the city's mayor to ignore the racist group, about 1,000 people showed up to protest a few dozen members of the Ku Klux Klan who gathered in Charlottesville, Va. Saturday.

Klan members had called for a rally to oppose the city's plans to remove a statue of Robert E. Lee, the Confederate general. About 30 to 50 Klan members were escorted by police to and from the city's Justice Park.

[...]

The KKK arrived around 3:45 p.m., according to the Charlottesville Daily Progress. Klan members only stayed at the scene for less than half an hour, Hausman reports. When they began to leave, "the crowd tried to stop the Klansmen from driving off" she says.

The Daily Progress reports police declared an "unlawful assembly" at 4:40 p.m., and "a line of officers in riot gear donned gas masks and set off canisters of tear gas."

Law enforcement made 23 arrests, according to a statement from the mayor, who added that "2 people were treated for heat injuries and one for an alcohol-related issue."

So a 20:1 ratio of Antifa to Klansmen, who were escorted by police but were assaulted anyway? As for uniformed NAZIs, there were maybe 5.

The torchlight crowd chanting, "you will not replace us" the evening before the riot has been dubbed "white nationalist", and attributed racism, although the chant doesn't involve race. In fact, it seems more related to the Black Segregation of the Democrat hierarchy and BLM vitriol and Black Racism. And possibly related to the black frenzy to get statues of whites demolished.

There is little doubt that the destruction of the Confederate historical figures will ultimately result in statue replacement of black figures of one sort or another; at least I'll be surprised if that doesn't occur. And that will represent black racism with regard to whites, which is the modern "act of saints".

Is there more to this, other than the media skewed reports?

I'm Thinking YES.

Was The Charlottesville Riot A Set-Up?

The first item worth noting in this tragedy is that the organizer, Jason Kessler, appears to be an equal opportunity provocateur
More like a false flag interloper, working with the Left.

RTWT, There.

Micro-Aggressions Get Promoted to New Status

Professors advised to treat racial microaggressions in classrooms like assault
I recall clearly that being white is a micro-aggression, and that even if a white renounces his/her privilege, then s/he is a liar as well as an aggressor. After all, whites cannot get rid of their privilege, because, well it's obvious: they are white, and therefore have privilege.

So being white is now an assault on non-whites. I suppose that a deep tan (or orange) doesn't absolve the sin of whiteness. And blue eyes and/or blond hair, well you might as well stand up against the wall and wait for Antifa to figure out their weapons.

Meanwhile, Back in Iran...

The Iranian Parliament Chanted 'Death to America' while voting more cash for missiles.
No doubt using the plane-load of cash sent to them by Obama...

The Establishment Draws Its Line

The Marxist culture war has now produced the enemy which the (nearly, if not totally) entire establishment political structure can join in hating: white "supremacists". The Marxists have been successful in Charlottesville by the tactic of attracting the entire spectrum of the population which wishes to defend the historical markers, and in fact, the history of the USA as a nation. The Left cannot tolerate the statues which honor their own heroes: the artifacts of the Democrat Secession and Civil War to protect Democrat-owned slavery of blacks.

The gathering at Charlottesville has been declared to be White Supremacist. And included in the group were, indeed, some white supremacists. But not all. The term "White Supremacist" is now the pejorative applied to all who are not Marxist Progressives.

So the official Oppressor Class in the Marxist Three Class system of class war has been named: we are all to be known as White Supremacists.

I have little doubt that the term, "fascist", will be competing with the term, "white supremacist", as the holy warriors of the "Alt Left" (new term thanks to Trump) continue to weaponize to beat and maim protestors and bystanders they deem beneath themselves.

Here's a prediction: sooner or later the Right will false-flag the Antifas by dressing up in all black and attacking from behind and within the Antifa population. Does that qualify as 4th gen warfare?

Here's another thought: Now that the entire political structure is anti-Trump, he might have to go third party in 2020. If that split happens there is a decent chance of the Democrats electing a psycho, say Pocahontas Warren, and the hammer coming down on the rest of us.

ADDENDUM:
It's important to note the elevation of Antifa and its violence to the status of moral heroes who are fighting racism (white supremacy). Antifa will likely garner more members due to the messianic savior image it is receiving from politicians, MSM, and celebs. Antifa could morph into the equivalent of the Red Army in Russia's communist revolution assault on humanity. We already have the Lenins, Trotskys, and are just awaiting our Stalin. With the universities, corporations and much of the military already converged, and with Trump on the ropes, nothing can be surprising anymore.

ADDENDUM II:
Charlottesville demonstrations: Law profs say white society at large bears responsibility
It's always the same for these folks: whites are evil.

Tuesday, August 15, 2017

I Won't Give Wal*Mart Any Business If I Can Help It

Walmart's Doug McMillon lectures Trump about "White Supremacists". Not BLM. Not Antifa. Not Marxist culture warriors calling for genocide of whites. Walmart's Doug is taking offense at whites who were attacked by Antifa. Walmart has gone arrogantly Leftist, blaming whites for the Antifa/BLM violence.

Walmart seems to think that it will not lose customers, just as Target thought. Walmart has lost me. Amazon has everything I need, possibly including groceries except maybe perishables. Dollar stores are popping up like convenience stores. There are sufficient local groceries.

Walmart's racism against whites is fully in line with the Democrat's position on eliminating whites from politics, at least in the party of Donks. The morality of anti-white racism is spreading like wildfire. Whites will take the blame for Antifa's violence, BLM murders, and all sorts of reversed logic assaults on the USA. Walmart and Google: two of a kind, different markets, same arrogant bullshit.

Prof Claims Criticism = Repression

Professor: Journalism, outrage over academics’ provocative statements is ‘technique of repression’
Don't criticize US! You Oppressors, you! We'll call for your genocide without any lip from you!

IowaHawk Still at the Top of his Game

Boom! Iowahawk obliterates Markos Moulitsas’ shameful Charlottesville spin with 1 tweet
Savor it there...

Jeff Goldstein, on Alt Right

I told you all before and I'll repeat it now: the alt right is not conservative, and it is every bit as driven by identity politics and blood essentialism as the prog left.

Antifa, BLM, CAIR, the New Black Panthers, La Raza, the Pussy Hatters, the KKK -- these are all identity movements and all formed and animated by the kind of identity politics championed by the left, and legitimated by the likes of Edward Said and other academic cultural Marxists who recognized the way to power was to divide, and then control, particular identity groups, whose narratives they seek to create and police.

The alt-right is only "right wing" in the continental sense. The American conservative is classically liberal, while the American progressive is Fabian socialist.

Don't listen to labels; follow the assumptions made by each movement -- the alt right, the prog left -- and you'll soon recognize that they are the same. This is tribalism, no more and no less. And when tribes are at odds, they clash over territory -- be it physical territory or political power. What we are witnessing is an attempt to corrupt the ideals of a propositional nation based on individualism and individual universal rights (and that's how our Constitutional republic is designed to operate) -- a lesson Google's pillorying of a software engineer as "anti-diversity" should have made clear. Intolerance is a hallmark of every authoritarian movement. Simply pretending some intolerance is more noble, which is affected by self-servingly dismissing dissenters as purveyors of "hate," is a ham-fisted surrender to anti-intellectual sophistry.

You should reject this archaic collectivism from whatever group espouses it, because in the end it is simply anti-individualism dressed in mob attire to bolster cowardice and bigotry in numbers.

You were warned.
Anti-intellectual sophistry, eh? In the face of actual, documented, daily hate? Jeff: are you impaired in some data input manner?

The inability to determine content seems endemic to these apologists who insist that the Alt-Right is merely identity. Of course it is identity! Buckley conservatism is an identity. RINO is an identity. Antifa is an identity. BLM is an identity. The Alt-Right was assigned its own identity, and named itself.

Today the Left has assigned everyone to an identity, usually with a false proposition for a name. For example, Antifa is actually fascist, communist and socialist. The Democrat National Committee is anti-white, and therefore black-power as their identity. The Republicans are inept, and that's their identity. Humans with testicles are male: that's their identity regardless of any of their claims to the contrary. If you don't recognize your identity, you are an underground dweller.

Some identities want full control over the other identities. That is the main thrust of assigning identities in the first place - Marxist Class War requires it. And that is what this "culture war" has devolved into: war for control of all aspects of everyone's lives. Google wants it. Facebook wants it. Antifa wants it. The BLM/DNC wants it.

The Alt-Right wants to be left alone. But its identity is "NOT Leftist, fascist, communist or other socialist". This tribalism has been forced on them. The Alt-right found its tribe the hard way. Conservatives as a tribe are actually Leftist toadies. Traditional liberalism became the Alt-Right (which is why it is defamed as White Nationalism).

So they cannot be left alone, under the rules of engagement in place by the Left (fascists, communists and other socialists). And they are forced to act in order to thwart their marginalization/enslavement into Re-Education camps.

Ignore THAT at your own peril, Goldstein.

The Ignoranti Speak

Brendan O'Neill shows the lack of comprehension that afflicts mugwumps, RINOS and the ignoranti:
It's becoming so clear now why the war of words between SJWs and the new white nationalists is so intense. It isn't because they have huge ideological differences -- it's because they have so much in common. Both are obsessed with race, SJWs demanding white shame, the alt-right responding with white pride. Both view everyday life and culture through a highly racialised filter. SJWs can't even watch a movie without counting how many lines the black actor has in comparison with the white actor so that they can rush home and tumblr about the injustice of it all. Both have a seemingly boundless capacity for self-pity. Both are convinced they're under siege, whether by patriarchy, transphobia and the Daily Mail (SJWs) or by pinkos and blacks (white nationalists). Both have a deep censorious strain. And both crave recognition of their victimhood and flattery of their feelings. This is really what they're fighting over -- not principles or visions but who should get the coveted title of the most hard-done-by identity. They're auditioning for social pity. "My life matters! My pain matters! I matter!" The increasing bitterness and even violence of their feud is not evidence of its substance, but the opposite: it's the narcissism of small differences.
"...not principles or visions..."? That is the most inaccurate statement which could possibly be made. If he believes it, then he is a fool. As the Left continues to deny venues to speech other than their own racist, fascist, violent eliminationist rhetoric - now focused on all whites - the necessary reaction to that is not an audition "for social pity". And to state that it is, is inexplicable except due to unconscionable ineptness of observation.

The Left's tactics go far beyond denial of venue, and include brutality at events of the Right, from Trump rallies to the rally to stop the destruction of Democrat history in the south. Antifa needn't schedule events nor obtain permits: they go to the meetings of the Other and bring mayhem, fire, bloody attacks - which are abetted by the police, usually by "standing down" (hell, just go home, cops!), or by actively forcing the Other into the weaponry of the antifa goons. Afterwards, the antifa rioting and brutality is blamed on Trump, of course, as the Leftist MSM and politicians cover for their nouveau-KKK.

But as for O'Neill, if he gets caught up in an actual culture war fray it won't be the Right that cold-cocks him. It will be antifa terrorists purging the world for Leftism and the lies the Left believes.

Yale Responds to Dilbert; Ross McKitrick Dissects

Dilbert Cartoon on Climate Change Prompts Rebuttal from Yale
The problem is this: they prove Dilbert's case.

While reading through this and summoning up some of the reference papers I came across the issue of Hockey Sticks, Red Noise, and the MBH98/99 data transformation used by certain, if not all, climate modellers. To summarize the MBH98/99 issue, applying the MBH98/99 data transformation to the actual virgin data: when MHB98 is applied to red noise, a hockey stick is produced. Further, data used by various modellers is claimed to be open to the public, but is not and requests for the data are consistently refused. Selection bias for data sources is rampant, using only data sources such as provide presupposed data trends (bristle cone pines), and ignoring others (ice core). The Arctic-melt warming is headlined while the ice increase in the Antarctic is ignored. Sea level is still claimed to be radically rising (with flood photos injected as false proof)... the sea level has not risen, because the Antarctic ice build-up has frozen the water lost by the Arctic and glaciers. Further, the warming that exists has caused extra plant growth, which sequesters both carbon and water.

The Michael Mann [1] MHB98 data transform should be sufficient to disqualify all models which use it.

Dilbert is right. As usual.

Note 1: Amazon: "A Disgrace to the Profession; the world's scientists, in their own words, on Michael Mann, his hockey stick, and their damage to science."

Monday, August 14, 2017

Charlottesville Police Didn't Stand Down; They Sided With Antifa

Reports are coming out indicating that the C'ville police broke up the Rightists into small groups and pushed them into antifa. The police have stood down in past riots, allowing antifa to attack the Other, but this time they apparently actively participated, on the side of antifa rioters.

The peaceful night torch march was hailed as a success due to the absence of antifa - who didn't know about it.

So the peaceful nature of the demonstrators was fully demonstrated. The police and antifa changed all that the next day.

The tactics will have to change, as historical markers of Democrat Racism are being deleted from history. There is no telling when gunfire will breakout and the civil war will become official if it is not already. When that happens, I suspect that demonstrations will cease for the most part, and 4th generation warfare will become common.

Guerrilla warfare was effective, even in the first Civil War. This time the entire nation might be involved since every institution is infected, as Google has demonstrated. I think that it is possible that guerrillas might operate against the Deep State, too. But the black-clad basement dwellers will be either ignored into oblivion or doxxed and eradicated early on.

It's hard to imagine a scenario wherein the Left can be persuaded to leave the rest of us alone.

The Battle for the USA is Defined and Joined

Vox Day
Tit-for-tat is now in order. Do you have an employee who supports Black Lives Matter on Twitter? Fire them. Do you have any employees who are SJWs? Fire them. Anyone who puts rainbows on Facebook? Fire them.

If James Damore and Cole White can be fired for their beliefs, so can everyone else. Once a tactic has been legitimized by the Left, don't hesitate to use it. The Left has made it very clear that peaceful coexistence is no longer possible, so stop trying to coexist with them.

This development isn't something to fear. Why are they doing this now? Because they are terrified of the gathering momentum and they are desperate to somehow stop it.

Meanwhile, (((Ben Shapiro))) is still lying about the Alt-Right. It is correct to say that it includes white nationalists, but it is blatantly false to claim that it is entirely white nationalists, or that it is a white supremacist philosophy.

The fact that our enemies feel the need to lie about us and misrepresent our views is one of the strongest indicators that our views are convincing and catching on with more and more former conservatives and libertarians and liberals alike.

[Emphasis Added]
How can there be compromise when constitutional liberties are summarily suppressed? When Leftists define the traditional Liberal, Constitutional Other (somewhat gently called "Deplorables" last year) as NAZIs, coming to kill Leftists?


Note the irrational hysteria here:

Fake Rightists

I haven't had time to sort through the information carnage regarding the demonstrations at Charlotte. But if actual NAZIs were there, they are not on the Right; they are socialists. But they are likely anti-communist, too, so if they recognize the Democrat antifa and KKK as communist and confront them, then its socialists vs. socialists. As socialists they are mirror images of the antifa/KKK Democrat socialists.

My uninformed understanding is that the alt-Right had the permission to demonstrate, and the Leftists just showed up (illegally) to cause mayhem/bloodshed and blame it on the Other for being irritating to them. I could be wrong, but that's the way it usually works... Speech is violence and violence is speech, depending on who is doing it. The Left got the violence they wished for, and the nation now has to mourn the death of an uninvited counter protester, killed by a psycho with cats named after mass murderers. But I could be wrong, maybe the murderer is a legitimate Right Winger.

There will be more of this, and I predicted a bloody summer this year. I thought it would be more wide spread.

As an aside, I wonder how many of the Brownshirts are FBI undercovers... Maybe all but one?